A Candid World

The phrase “a candid world” is one you don’t hear very often. Its one notable occurance in history to date has been very notable, though. That occurance is as the addressee of a letter, if the US Declaration of Independence is thought of as an open letter of explanation from the Colonies regarding why they were revolting.

The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

It is now also, though, the name of an upcoming documentary about the Free State Project. Watch the trailer.

I approve of and salute the civil disobedience, public education and other non-electoral efforts of the libertarian activists in New Hampshire.

Please help promote the trailer for “A Candid World” on Digg.

Learn more about the documentary project at: http://candid-world.com/

Share This

Can you stack bullshit higher than a Kochtopus is tall?

UPDATE: The post below is misplaced criticism, wrongly directed at David Gordon due to my own misinterpetation of what he was saying at the end of the piece discussed. After the second of Gordon’s comments below, I’m satisfied that my reading of the piece was in error. I am sorry, Mr. Gordon.

David Gordon’s “The Kochtopus vs. Murray N. Rothbard, Part II” would be a great piece on the rivalry between Mises and Cato (in which all earnest libertarians should side with the Mises Institutue, as I see it, if they take a side in it at all) if Gordon hadn’t abused the opportunity to enlighten by pulling a bait-and-switch at the very end with regard to the Ron Paul newsletter fiasco.

“As mentioned in Part I, the Kochtopus strongly opposes the Mises Institute, which aims to continue the Rothbardian policy of Austrian economics, laissez-faire, and peace that Cato was established to promote. The opposition continues to the present day. Reason, now under Koch patronage, did not react to Ron Paul’s The Revolution: A Manifesto with the praise one would expect for this best-selling libertarian book. David Weigel, in a post of April 30, 2008 on the Reason website, took the occasion to attack Lew Rockwell and other so-called “paleos.” The Kochtopus cannot forgive those who continue to champion Murray Rothbard.”

Weigel’s motives for writing whatever (or rather, the motives it is speculated he has) shouldn’t have anything to do with the matter of whether or not the ideas expressed in that writing stand or fall on their own merits. Gordon has very carefully spent time and effort detailing a true story of real libertarian struggle in the Mises-Cato rivalry, the corrupting influence of state-capitalist Koch money and the resulting institutionalized establishmentarianism in what started out as a radical organization, Cato. How sad that Gordon chooses to metaphorically spit on his own work by attempting to use it deceitfully in support of the contemptible.

Those who don’t want libertarianism falsely equated with racism, and have resulting concerns about the Ron Paul newsletter thing, are just Koch lackeys with a grudge against Rothbard? Is that what you’re saying, Mr. Gordon? I’m not buying that.

Share This

Cat herding 101

I was reviewing some stuff and noticed where I had promoted on Digg a recent book review by Kevin Carson. There was one key passage in the piece that seemed particularly apt for explaining the overall left-libertarian approach as I see it.

“…[M]ost people who display egalitarian reactions against existing inequalities and concentrations of wealth may well believe that what they hate is the “free market.” But that’s only because the rhetoric of “free markets” has been perverted, for the most part, by apologists for those concentrations of wealth which result from privilege and other forms of state intervention. What they hate, they rightly hate. They’re wrong to believe that what they hate is the “free market.” But it’s hard to blame them, when you can’t turn on the TV or read an editorial page without seeing a fundamentally statist economic system of special privilege and protection for big business and the rich described as “our free market system.”

This has organizational implications for both radicals and moderates, both libertarians and “leftists”. The socio-political mass maneuver that needs to be accomplished can be compared to a zipper zipping. Proponents of fundamentally correct but often tragically misapplied theory, on the one hand, need to be melded with groups of people who, on the other hand, have instinctually latched onto approximately correct views about the world around them and then rationalized/supported those views with less-than-ideal theory.

Share This

Yes, I’m on Twitter now…

While I’m not sure that I’ll definitely find it useful, I’ve been persuaded to try Twitter. Those interested can follow me there[RSS] or get a consolidated activity feed[Atom].

Share This

LIBER-FAIL-IAN: Minarchism and partyarchy as opportunity cost

The 2008 Liberty magazine poll results are out and they support something I’ve been talking about for the past few years and regard as crucially important for libertarians. The Libertarian Party specifically and electoral politics generally are very poor tools for the advancement of libertarian ideas if we’re talking about radical (i.e. real) libertarianism. Consider the first two questions alone:

1. There is a proper role for government, but that role is much smaller than the role government plays at present.

Today: 89.5% agree
20 years ago: 66% Agree

2. Government should be eliminated altogether.

Today: 10.5% agree
20 years ago: 31 % agree

Whether there should be some minimal government is one of the oldest controversies in libertarian thought. If the poll results are representative of overall libertarian opinion, the minarchists clearly are making their case more persuasively than are the anarchists.

The trendline is clearly away from anarchist sentiments. The above supposes, though, that anarchists are (and have been) making their case among the movement cross-section represented by Liberty magazines reader poll — and that it is this case which has been rejected in favor of a purported minarchist case supposedly being actively advanced. No such thing is going on at all. Rather, within the libertarian movement, anarchists are not making their case because they’re busy “doing politics” and minarchists enjoy the pro-government bias inherent in existing government being the status quo.

I assert that anarchists in the LP (”partyarchs“) haven’t been adequately making their case because the attempt to use a political party as a vehicle for the communication of ideology results in our best and brightest people being tied up in endless platform wars with establishmentarian elements and vainly struggling to defend radicalism from smears by our worst enemies — those who want to define libertarianism out of existence by making the word come to mean something else entirely.

Perhaps the next LP executive director can be Grima Wormtongue.

The point is not merely that the libertarian movement is currently going down a wrong path, but that it has been going down the wrong path since the founding of the Libertarian Party in 1971. It’s not just that YOU, Mr. & Mrs. Partyarch (you anarcho-wretches) are somehow doing something wrong. As the Liberty poll results show, the libertarian movement as it existed 20 years ago was doing something wrong. Rather than libertarians gradually winning over mainstream society to our way of seeing things, mainstream society is gradually winning over libertarians to their way of seeing things.

Electoral politics FAILS. There are built-in incentives for the distortion of our ideas contained in the approach and I maintain that those incentives are inherent in the approach itself.

The solution is revolution.


Death to the Party!

Ultimately, simple economic analysis points the way. If you’re busy sinking time and energy into building the Libertarian Party as an institution, you are foregoing using that time and energy to talk about anarchism. Opportunity costs do not merely arise in just financial matters, but in all decision-making.

Share This

True cost of gasoline?

The real price of gasoline? Possibly $15 plus per gallon according to this 1998 study from an org called the International Center for Technology Assessment.

I haven’t yet looked closely into the methods used to calculate that figure, so don’t count this blog post as an endorsement. I’m interested in the type of information that this purports to be, though. If anybody wants to critique the ICTA study, have at it in the comments.

Also, they released an update in January 2005.

Share This

We can’t stop here! This is bat country!

We’re in for one wild ride. See here:

Boom Without End: What The Web Knows…..

Which brings to mind a question:

Would there be interest in taking up a collection to fund a Mandarin translation of New Libertarian Manifesto?

Share This

Food rationing; food shortages

It’s starting; just a little bit.

I understand that April is not to late in the season to plant potatoes in much of the US.

MORE: US Facing Diminishing Supplies of Rye & Wheat
As Food Prices Soar, Some Shortages Appear
Run on rice makes its way to U.S.
Era of cheap food ends as prices surge
Americans hoard food as industry seeks regs
Bay Area Shoppers Asked To Limit Rice Purchases
Wall Street Journal editorial: Time for Americans to stockpile food

Share This

Genocide, Canadian style

From theConverted: Anarchist Style Justice

“In Canada, we have a dark, dirty little secret - our Government, in cahoots with the churches, specifically the Catholic, Anglican and United Churches, tried to destroy native Canadians. They did this through active cultural assimilation, apartheid-like political enshrinement of dependence (aka “The Indian Act”) and now, it seems, through crimes of outright murder and genocide.

Harsh?

Yes, but true.

The latest in this tragedy occurred last week when…”

Read the rest.

Share This

[RadGeek] Remembering Rockefeller’s Ludlow Massacre

“On 4/20/1914, the National Guard and the company thugs pretended to negotiate with Louis Tikas while setting up machine-guns in the high-points around the camps. They fired down into shanty-town and, after many of the strikers dug into the ground for cover, they torched the tents. By the end of the night 45 men, women, and children were dead.”

read more | digg story

Share This
Close
E-mail It
Socialized through Gregarious 42