They fried the childrens brains with gamma rays

I thought I had lost the capacity to weep. I was wrong.

In 1951, the director general of the Israeli Health Ministry, Dr. Chaim Sheba, flew to America and returned with seven x-ray machines, supplied to him by the American army.

They were to be used in a mass atomic experiment with an entire generation of Sephardi youths to be used as guinea pigs. Every Sephardi child was to be given 35,000 times the maximum dose of x-rays through his head. For doing so, the American government paid the Israeli government 300 million Israeli liras a year. The entire Health budget was 60 million liras. The money paid by the Americans is equivalent to billions of dollars today. . .

The film made it perfectly plain that this operation was no accident. The dangers of x-rays had been known for over forty years. We read the official guidelines for x-ray treatment in 1952. The maximum dose to be given a child in Israel was .5 rad. There was no mistake made. The children were deliberately poisoned.

From: Israel Insider
Hat tip to: Militant Libertarian

One of the most famous American judicial quips about obscenity is that old line: “I know it when I see it.” Once again, we are reminded that government is an obscenity.

Yes, I believe in evolution

Texas Pastor Electrocuted During Baptism

A pastor performing a baptism was electrocuted inside his church Sunday morning after grabbing a microphone while partially submerged, a church employee said.

My sympathy goes out to the mans surviving family and friends, but I’ve got to tell you that I think we have a definite Darwin Awards nominee with this one.

Libby indictment: thirty years isn’t good enough

And now we learn the details of the much anticipated Libby indictment.

The grand jury indictment charged Libby with one count of obstruction of justice, two of perjury and two of making false statements. If convicted on all five, he could face as much as 30 years in prison and $1.25 million in fines.

Even if he is found guilty on all counts, we would not be appreciably closer to justice truly being served. That contemptible piece of dog crap was part of a criminal conspiracy, members of which rank much higher than himself, to perpetrate a fraud on the American people as a fake justification for an unnecessary war and manage the ensuing coverup — to include retaliation against those who sought to expose that conspiracy. He is an accessory to several thousand counts of murder — including innocent civilians, American troops and Iraqi patriots. Hanging’s to good for him.

Invasion of Iraq: a secret surrender?

The occasion of the 2000th US military fatality in Iraq is as good a time as any to review what we know about the real, rather than stated, reasons for the invasion. Karen Kwiatkowski does a remarkably good job of doing so in the text of a talk she’s been giving at sundry locations for a while now: Our Inscrutable Iraq Policy: Why We Did It, What To Do Now, and What Happens Next

I’d like to discuss one thing that occurred to me while reading her text. I freely admit this is only speculation. I make no apologies for that, since a White House policy of lying through it’s teeth reduces us all to mere speculation on the motives of the war criminals in DC.

Consider the following. In the wake of 9/11, those who were paying attention learned that Al Qaeda’s stated reasons for the attacks were the following:

  1. US government aid to Israel
  2. US troops stationed in Saudi Arabia
  3. US embargo of Iraq (and resulting civilian deaths there)

As distasteful as it may be, try to mentally put yourself in the role of the murderous but cowardly politicians in the Bush admin for just a moment. Would it be so out of character for them to decide they were going to respond to 9/11 by giving Al Qaeda what it wants, as best they politically could?

Ending military aid to Israel would simply not be negotiable in their eyes. They would consider that politically untenable.

As Kwiatkowski points out, though, US policymakers were already unhappy with Saudi Arabia as a host country for US military bases in the region — and not having bases in the region would similarly be non-negotiable from their perspective. So, finding a place to put US military bases in the region, but outside of Saudi Arabia, acquired a new urgency after 9/11.

Now consider the embargo of Iraq. Ending it was non-negotiable as long as Saddam was in power, from the perspective of the Bush admin. It was non-negotiable for some of the same reasons almost no failed government policy ends after shown to be a bad idea — the pride and vanity of the politicians involved.

The only politically acceptable way, in the eyes of the Bush admin, for Al Qaeda’s third demand (end of the Iraq embargo) to be met would be the ouster of Saddam — which would conveniently allow Al Qaeda’s second demand (US troops out of Saudi Arabia) to be met as well, while satisfying the desire of US policymakers to continue to strategically dominate the oil fields.

We knew that although Al Qaeda objected to the embargo of Iraq, they also hated the secular Ba’ath government of Iraq. Getting rid of the Ba’ath might have even been viewed within the top levels of the Bush administration as a nice little gift wrapped peace offering to Osama; a consolation prize to make up for continuing US aid to Israel.

It almost works out to be “the perfect crime”. Saddam was already unpopular among the US public. A few lies told by the right officials and — presto! — everybody wins, or so the Bushies would see it. Al Qaeda gets most of what they were perceived to want, Bush gets to give it to them while not looking like he’s giving it to them and simultaneously not losing anything the political class cares about. And, last but not least, the bloodlust of the gullible among the American public would be sated — after a dissatisfying period in which US forces invaded Afghanistan to supposedly “go after AL Qaeda”, but suspiciously dilly-dallied around in the lowlands and let the top Al Qaeda leadership slip away from their mountain hideouts. The only people whose wants and needs weren’t addressed were the Iraqis. Their job was to do the dying — which they have, although they’ve taken 2,000 US troops with them so far.

This view of events makes sense because that’s how politicians like Bush operate. It’s the same sort of good ole Texas legislative horse-trading where you try to find a win-win situation for everybody who has politicial power — and not give a rat’s ass about who among the powerless you hurt or what lies you have to tell to pull the deal off.

Please note that I am not suggesting a literal deal was struck. Rather, the situation shows all the marks of a failed, ham-fisted attempt by Bush to try to make an unstated deal. No quid pro quo would be necessary. That’s not how the smiling men in suits operate. They depend on mutual back-scratching and second-guessing of what each other wants. In their good ole boy chauvinism, ignorance and hubris; they wouldn’t be able to imagine that’s not the way Al Qaeda leaders think.

So, there you have it: a theory, just a theory, that the invasion of Iraq was a failed attempt at a secret surrender in the War on Terrorism.

Wouldn’t THAT be ironic?

With indictments pending, Mr. Cheney seems to be tempting fate with his advocacy of torturing prisoners. The Al Franken option may be relatively humane, compared to the future the Vice President seems bent on preparing for himself.

MLL pamphlets available

I now have a page where you can get the PDF versions of Movement of the Libertarian Left pamphlets that Wally Conger is re-publishing. Samuel Edward Konkin III, the author, didn’t believe in copyright. They may, thus, be:

  • downloaded
  • shared over P2P networks
  • republished on any web site
  • printed
  • and distributed

freely. For that matter, they can even be sold — which might be a good idea to help cover the printing costs. More pamphlets will be added as Wally re-publishes the ones SEK3 wrote, or as soon as other people write new ones that may be similarly freely distributed.

The Navy doesn’t use that wireless gear and neither should you

Back in July of 2004, the US Navy’s network security people imposed a Navy-wide moratorium on the use of commercial wireless equipment of the sort likely to be found on your own home wireless network. A waiver process exists, but approval is contingent on confirmation that DoD requirements are met. Consumer-grade wireless equipment doesn’t meet those requirements, largely due to relying on relatively weak encryption schemes like WEP and WPA to secure the wireless connection.

We’re not even talking about the totally seperate networks for handling classified information. For ordinary naval IT needs, use of the wireless equipment you probably use is simply forbidden. As one article states:

Advances in the art of cracking WEP and WPA networks have made arguments for using these encryption schemes in Navy networks indefensible.

“Navy Wireless Networks - FIPS 140-2 or Bust” by Cmdr. John MacMichael, CHIPS - The Department of the Navy Information Technology Magazine

Even so, compliance with the moratorium has been an issue.

Popular small office, home office (SOHO) equipment, such as the Linksys WRT54G Netgear WGR614 and D-Link DI-24 have begun to appear on Navy networks as rogue access points (AP).

Navywide, relatively few wireless systems were reported to NNWC, so it is likely that not all wireless networks were reported.

The article reports that this lack of internal compliance has aroused so much concern that Navy information security honchos have directed their network security tiger team, operating out of the Fleet Information Warfare Center, to search for unauthorized wireless networks on certain naval installations — presumably to the detriment of more demanding security work that highly-skilled military hackers would be capable of. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to just grab a laptop and do some wardriving — but since compliance with directives already issued to regular naval IT personnel is the problem

Well, you can do the math.

So, why do they have their panties in such a bunch? Well, it’s like this…

The tools for defeating WEP/WPA wireless security have been vastly simplified. Some mentioned in the above article include:

It is not just these free tools themselves, though, but their increasingly slick, easy, almost idiot-proof packaging and documentation — particularly their inclusion in security tester toolkits freely available as bootable Linux live CDs.

To use the aforementioned tools, average knowledge of Linux is required to patch and install unsupported wireless drivers, compile Unix-based tools, capture network traffic and execute WEP and WPA-PSK exploits. Even with the increase in documentation and ease of compiling drivers and tools, these tasks were hurdles that had to be overcome by a novice attacker. But these barriers have all but been removed with the advent of the live Linux distribution based on the Knoppix Linux distribution

Knoppix variants such as Auditor, Knoppix-STD (Security Tools Distribution) and Whoppix [recently renamed WHAX] have precompiled drivers, software and cryptologic libraries that allow even a novice Linux user to launch sophisticated attacks against wired or wireless networks.

What that basically means is that a significant portion of the US military’s IT infrastructure is vulnerable to anyone who download a CD, burn it and then follow some simple directions. Really.

Now, you may think your secuity needs aren’t as demanding as those of the US military — even for their mundane, unclassified needs. You’d be right, to an extent; but you bear the brunt of the consequences if someone steals your credit card number or otherwise maliciously defeats your PC’s security.

Political activists and dissidents, in particular, should take note. Abuses of law enforcement powers for political purposes, as seen during the COINTELPRO era, are once more a legitimate concern in the US under the Patriot Act. Furthermore, as political discourse grows ever more shrill, the probability of politically motivated freelance mayhem from ordinary people who exceedingly disagree with you is, perhaps, more likely than ever.

Given the importance of computer and internet usage for political purposes in these times, then, the average freedom-loving political activist ought to seriously look into educating themselves on computer security topics, so they can take the steps they need to take to protect themselves.

Dear Santa: Yamaha concept bike — “Gen-Ryu”

I’m in love. Just take a look at the picture and you’ll understand. No, not the little Asian woman. The bike! THE BIKE!

Japanese motorcycle giant Yamaha unveils the concept model of a high-performance hybrid motorcycle, the ‘Gen-Ryu,’ equipped with a 600cc engine and electric motor hybrid system which can achieve over 1,000cc class machine performance at the 39th Tokyo Motor Show in Makuhari.

Yamaha Gen-Ryu [JPEG Image, 379×250 pixels]

Plus more from Engadget or straight from Yamaha Japan.

Chuck0 in Kansas City: “The police are not our friends”

The following speech was delivered this afternoon by Infoshop’s webmaster to a rally of 40 rain-drenched people in Ilus Davis Park in downtown Kansas City, Missouri. The rally was part of the national day of action against police brutality being observed in dozens of cities. Chuck0 delivered this rant from the steps of the mobile Tactical Ice Cream Unit as rained poured on our little rally.

Infoshop News - Chuck0: The police are not our friends

Novel: On the Steppes of Central Asia

Let me introduce you to a novel, available to read free online or purchase in paper published format, that really spells out a lot of things pretty clearly.

The Anarchism.net editors are thrilled to present a web version of Richard D. Fuerle’s anarchist novel “On the Steppes of Central Asia”. The novel, apart from being an exciting story, presents a thorough and fully conceivable yet thought-provoking version of a well-functioning anarchist society. It provides both a framework for a non-State system of justice and a solution to the problem of “anarchy in a world of governments.” On the Steppes of Central Asia is a source of inspiration for anarchists as well as a convincing argument for anarchism.

http://anarchism.net/steppes.htm

The following passage, a conversation between a visitor to a market anarchist society and his local guide/mentor, I found particularly well reasoned.

“OK. We will presume that you’re not an anarchist - that you believe that someone must rule and that you are that ruler. There are no constraints on your power - no constitution or legislature except, of course, that since you are not an anarchist you must retain your power.”
“Sounds great.” I would like to report that I immediately thought of all the good and wonderful things I would do, but I actually thought of a castle filled with beautiful, naked women.
“Now, with those premises, let’s add a little realism and see where that takes us. Your first priority, of course, must be to secure your power because that is the sine qua non for anything else you might want to do. The realism is that since your position as ruler is a desirable one, many people will plot to overthrow you. You must anticipate that - how would you deal with it?”
“I suppose I would need some guards and maybe some informers.”
“And how would you pay for these people?”
“From taxes, of course.”
“Then you will need tax collectors, too?”
“Yes.”
“And what will you do with those people who refuse to pay taxes?”
“They will have to be punished and their property seized - there is no alternative.”
“Suppose a tax revolt brews and the leader vows to die fighting you if you try to collect a single [penny] from him. Would you kill him?”
“I guess I would have to,” I reluctantly admitted.
“Now we can see a relationship developing between you and the people. They are no longer your equals. In fact, they are hardly even people anymore - they are more like a crop of barnyard animals, like sheep or chickens that are raised then sheared or killed for what they have produced. So, if someone else kills your animals or takes their products it would be a crime against you, not against the animals. Sound familiar? In a money economy, the products of your animals can be taken as taxes. Since it is in your interest to maximize the collection of taxes, it is likely that you will favor ideas and behavior that encourage compliance with your laws and the production of taxes. For example, you might promote belief in a religion that advocates hard work, no dissipating vices, and rendering unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. Do you know any religions like that?”
I shook my head, but, of course I did.
“It is very expensive to go around bashing heads all the time to collect taxes and secure obedience to your laws; it is much easier to simply convince everyone to pay and obey. That means propaganda - you need to control the media. This way, anything ‘good’ you do will be reported, but mistakes, waste, and ‘necessary violence’ will not.”
“You’re saying that I have to be a conniving liar to be a ruler?”
“No, I’m only saying that you have an incentive to be a conniving liar.”

Close
E-mail It
Socialized through Gregarious 42