Via freeman: Stromberg on land theft

Freeman reads Agorist Quarterly so you don’t have to (even though you should). Check out this post regarding Stromberg on land theft:

Stromberg’s analysis complements the analysis of people like Kevin Carson and Karl Marx by coming to the conclusion that the English enclosures were a result of political coercion benefitting a privledged minority. This essay also provides the additional service of comparing the English enclosures to not only the Soviet collectivization of land, but also to the Latin American latifundismo, or feudal land monopolies that still exist to this day. All of these coercive actions had adverse effects on the peasantries of each respective country.

Tax Day Actions

Via Next Left Notes:

We Will Not Be Silent
17 SDS and War Resisters League activists were arraigned on April 17th for their arrests in Times Square on March 19, 2006 (third anniversary of the Iraq invasion). The charges were dismissed for insufficient evidence. Wearing white roses at a symbol of resistance to fascism, the activists left court and joined their colleagues in a spirited protest at the Internal Revenue Service offices on 44th and 6th…after a two hour vigil the protestors marched to Times Square and on down to the general Post Office at 34th St. Carrying coffins and shouting “Happy Tax Day - Your Tax Dollars Are Funding Murder” the procession attracted alot of attention from passersby.

Do check out the photos. Feel free to post your Tax Day Actions in comments below.

Aaron Russo’s “America: From Freedom to Fascism”

While Aaron Russo is more of a reformist, constitutionalist libertarian rather than a left libertarian of my sort, I do support his new film, America: From Freedom to Fascism. This movie has great potential to build awareness of the basic problem of lack of freedom.

I’ve received an email asking for monetary support in helping promote the film. Let me share it with you here, FWIW:

Dear Readers:

“Oh, my God, I had no idea!”

That’s what the audience is saying as they walk out of Aaron Russo’s new film, America: From Freedom to Fascism. Their voices are hushed. Some faces are pale and wet with tears, sick at what they’ve discovered. Many are red, angry to learn for the first time that they have been robbed — their country, their rights, and their very future have been stolen from them and their children.

But it may all end right there – all Aaron’s work, all his sacrifice, all his vision, all the possibilities to make a real change in America, unless we pitch in and help him. Let me explain.

Everything in the world was stacked against this movie. What major studio would back a movie this controversial? A movie that exposes the entire Federal Reserve scam the income tax fraud, and the IRS? A movie that catches a former IRS commissioner boasting that the IRS isn’t subject to Supreme Court decisions? A movie that publicizes government brutality against protestors? A movie that reveals how America was swindled out of her gold reserve? A movie that pulls back the curtain on the coming police state in the US, with its plans to tag everyone with a national ID card and implant an RFID chip in every man, woman, and child? A movie that lays bare the whole New World Order?

Warner Brothers and MGM and Fox wouldn’t touch that project with a thirty foot pole, let alone put up money to make the movie. Those giant corporations – already in bed with big government – would never produce or release that movie.

So without asking for anybody’s help, Aaron Russo set out to make this film, because he knew it had to be made. He put up 100% of the money to make the film. He invested two years of his life. He laid his name and his reputation on the line. Not just for the sake of his own freedom, but for yours, too, and your children’s, and for millions of Americans who don’t know sic ‘em from come here about what their government really does, or the tyranny that government has already mapped out for them. Aaron made this movie so everyone in America would understand, so people would really get it. And when they see the movie, they do. (You can view a trailer for the movie at www.freedomtofascism.com.)

Let me make something plain. This is not a movie that divides, but a movie that unites. Aaron does not work like Michael Moore, who plays to the Left to increase polarization. Aaron’s movie plays to the whole country. It doesn’t take sides. It’s not Democrat or Republican, it’s not left, not right, but dead on.

Now Aaron Russo needs our help. The money and the years have been spent, the movie has been made, the test audiences are raving about it, distribution has been arranged, but Aaron still needs our help.

The movie must still be marketed and advertised. It must be promoted and supported by TV, newspaper, and radio advertising to get it out to the largest audience possible, to every nook and cranny in America, every city, every town, every hamlet, every corner of America.

How could a single movie be that important? Because it will change forever Americans’ false perception of how things work here. Everybody has to see this movie. This is the tool we’ve been waiting for. It’s non-violent, it’s ruthlessly honest, and it can change America. Everybody who sees this movie gets it. The light goes on. Nobody has ever explained so much in one place before.

Without your help, Aaron has only enough steam to open in New York City on July fourth. After that, nothing will happen unless every one of us helps him.

If we help Aaron now, here’s what he can do.

  • premiere in two theaters in New York
  • then open in a few theatres in Los Angeles
  • then Chicago
  • then take it to two hundred theatres nation wide, and then 500, and then . .

But all that takes money.

By now you may be snorting, “Who is this guy Franklin Sanders to ask me for money to help promote a movie?

That’s a fair question, and here’s a fair answer. According to an assistant United States Attorney, I am “the most dangerous man in the mid-South.” What makes me so dangerous? I am the man who opened a gold and silver bank so that Americans could realise their right to honest, stable gold and silver money. That was perfectly legal, even in 1984, but the federal government didn’t like it. For my trouble I spent the next sixteen years fending off the feds, the IRS, and state government, trying to keep my wife and me out of jail, and trying to keep them from killing my seven children, my wife, and me. I even ended up going to jail.

I know — you think I’m crazy or lying. You can’t believe “our” government agents would do such terrible things. Most people can’t, and I understand why. It’s too horrible to believe. Besides, the government and the media work together to blacken everyone who stands for the law, the constitution, and the truth. They label them “trouble-makers” and “extremists”, and even, as a last resort, “terrorists.” Usually, it works, but our case was different. The federal government indicted 11 people out of our church (because the church elders refused to roll over for the IRS’s fishing expedition) as well as another 14 people. Some pled guilty, just to put an end to the nightmare. By the grace of God, the 16 of us who held out to the end were all acquitted. (You can read the entire story at www.the-moneychanger.com/dangerous.phtml.) The state also charged me in a related case, but I was convicted there.

And I should have been convicted, because I was guilty: guilty of speaking the truth, guilty of insisting the government abide by the law and the constitution, guilty of exposing the entire lying system of phoney money that steals the property and future from every single American. And if I had to do it all over again, as God is my helper I would do it without one moment’s hesitation, because it was the right thing to do.

Today Aaron Russo is guilty, too – guilty of making a movie to tell America the truth. And he needs our help.

Should one man take the cause of the whole nation on his own shoulders? Should one man give everything, while everyone else profits and none help? Any honest man must say, “No – let me help, too. I don’t want anybody else to carry the load for me.”

Here’s what Aaron needs: money to market and advertise America: From Freedom To Fascism. If we won’t help him, Aaron has told me he will make sure America sees this movie even if he has to walk it across America. But if he has to do that, the movie will never have the effect it could have. Its impact will fizzle out in little sparks, instead of the massive explosion it could touch off. Everybody who has seen this movie knows that it can change America.

And I know that in America today there is no effective movement to oppose, much less turn back, the plans to create a police state and turn us into a nation of slaves. At his own risk and expense, Aaron Russo has made a movie that might be the spark to set off an explosion in the public’s heart that might win back our liberties, and our children’s future.

This is not a distant cause. It is the cause of our rights and our ancient freedoms, right here in America, and it is not happening to somebody else. It’s happening right now to you, and to me, and this may be our last, best chance to wake up our neighbours. My friends know that I’m not much of one to talk about “last chances” because I know that Heaven has many more options than we can conceive.

Never before has the freedom movement had a professional like Aaron Russo on its side. Aaron work has won numerous gold records, platinum records, an Emmy, a Tony, and six Academy Award nominations. His films have received seven Golden Globe nomination and actually won three Golden Globes. To make this movie Aaron had to go against all the grain of Hollywood status and popularity. More than that, he had to love the truth.

We all know that advertising doesn’t come cheap. A full page ad in the New York Times costs $95,256.00. Half a page costs $52,920. A quarter page costs $26,460. One column inch costs $840.

Sounds impossible, but think: if only 529 of us each gave $100, we could buy that half page ad.

What am I asking from you? Give up two meals for your freedom.

You probably don’t balk at dropping $6.50 for a large white chocolate macchiatto at Starbucks. When you take your wife and kids out to eat, you don’t hesitate to lay out $60 at Pizza Hut. If it’s a special occasion and you really want to celebrate, you’ll go to Fancy French Jacques or L’Aubergine and drop a hundred fifty bucks for four people and congratulate yourself on a bargain.

I am asking you to donate the price of two meals out with your family to Aaron Russo, to promote America: From Freedom to Fascism. You name the price.

Please note: this is not an investment, but a gift to help Aaron make sure the most Americans possible see this film. Not one cent of your money will go to anything but promoting this movie. No, it’s not an “investment” in the usual sense because you won’t get any money back, but it most certainly is an investment in your nearest and dearest interests, and the return may be restoring your country and your rights.

You may think the price is too high, the risk of nothing happening too great. You may be right. It may be too late to turn America from her fate. That’s what the enemies of freedom want you to think.

In December, 1777 it looked like it was too late for America, and too late for freedom. Toward Valley Forge you could trace the path of Washington’s men by the blood their unshod feet left in the snow. When they arrived at their campsite, no shelters were waiting, so they spent the first two weeks building huts. Lacking blankets, they had to sit by the fire all night to keep from freezing. On December 23 Washington wrote to Congress that he had 2,898 men “unfit for duty because they were barefoot, and otherwise naked.” He wrote to his wife that she couldn’t come review the troops, because some were so ragged that their uniforms didn’t even cover their private parts.

To those men with the bleeding feet, it must have seemed too late for America, but they never went home. They never gave up. They gave their last breath.

Next to that, giving up a couple of meals in a restaurant doesn’t seem like much to risk, does it?

Respectfully yours,

Franklin Sanders
The Moneychanger
www.the-moneychanger.com
(888) 218-9226

P.S. If you hesitate, you’ll never get around to helping Aaron Russo, so please sit down right now, write him the biggest check you can write, and send it to

All Your Freedoms, Inc.
908 North La Cienega Blvd.
Los Angeles, California 90069

In the For line, write “Gift to promote AFFF.” Sorry, you won’t receive any fancy letters or acknowledgements or brass plaques, because every cent is needed to promote the film. However, you will have this: You will know that you have stood shoulder to shoulder in a line of patriots stretching back over 200 years. For me, that’s enough. I hope it will be for you, too.

P.P.S. There’s one more way you can help: send this letter to every friend you can think of. And when you do it, explain to them at the top of your e-mail that you understand nobody likes spam, but this is not spam and not junk mail. It’s a chance to restore America.

Call for revolutionary action at UVA

In response to news of the arrest of 17 students at the University of Virginia

Perhaps the worst victims of statism are rank and file employees of state-owned enterprises. State monopolization of social services and community institutions is the flip side of the coin accompanying the cartelization of the private sector on behalf of plutocratic forces. As opportunities for the common person to do for themself and each other are constrained within the monopolistic framework of state capitalism, some are tragically faced with little realistic choice but to sell their labor to the state. Soul-crushing regimentation within the dry and sterile bureaucracies of government or government-allied corporations are not the way human beings are meant to live and work.

Agorists provide a framework for less consistent libertarians to understand why not every government employee is our enemy, despite implacable opposition to government. That framework is Agorist Class Theory. To accept that the state is banditry but simultaneously deny that the poorest among us are undoubtedly among those who have been stolen from the most (in one fashion or another) is not rational.

Against that backdrop, libertarians ought to re-evaluate their historic hostility to labor organizing. In a genuinely free market, all would rightfully have the opportunity to seek and negotiate the best deal for themselves and their associates that they can. If whatever price the market will bear is good for the plutocrat, it’s just as good for the worker negotiating wages. Personally, I’m proud to be a dues paying IWW member.

With regard to state-owned enterprises in particular, the diversion of state funds into paying rank and file workers greater wages saps the resources the state has available to put to more destructive uses. To the agorist revolutionary, this has the added benefit of hastening the meltdown of the state, based on the financial strains from its own internal contradictions. Those contradictions are namely, that it seeks to provide “services” via stolen money while limiting opportunities for those services to be mutualized or provided through other non-state means. As Austrian economics informs us, it’s not genuinely a service without voluntary, willing payers.

Let me now draw your attention to the University of Virginia, where SDS members have been supporting the campaign to seek a living wage for rank and file University workers. From the UVA Living Wage Campaign web site:

Our Demands:

Our basic demand remains the same as always: All University employees, whether directly employed or hired through outside firms, must be paid a living wage of at least $10.72 per hour before benefits, adjusted at least annually to inflation and the cost of living in Charlottesville. Complete implementation also requires the following:

*Prioritization of currently employed workers. In implementing the living wage policy and in related organizational changes, no jobs, wages, or benefits will be eliminated or decreased as a result. Ultimately, the University has a responsibility to all members of its Community of Trust, and if contractors prefer to disengage from the University rather than respect our commitment to social justice, the University has an obligation to prioritize the employment of any workers who work under those contractors, and ensure that their job status at the University will not be eliminated as a result.

*Creation of an oversight committee. A committee should be formed to ensure fair and complete implementation of the agreed upon policy. This committee must include workers, students, faculty and administrators, and must work within the timeline of implementing this living wage policy by the first day of the 2006 Fall Semester.

Because our sit-in has been seriously considered and undertaken with the best interest of the University deeply at heart, we also demand that no one suffer disciplinary consequences or civil liability as a result of participation in these acts of peaceful civil disobedience. These immunity guidelines have routinely been demanded and met in the dozens of student sit-ins that have taken place nationally during the last decade.

The administration takes responsibility for ensuring that the University is a leader in terms of the students it produces, the faculty it attracts, and the research it does, but fails in the moral vision that it offers to the world. We will take that responsibility for this University that we love, and will continue to sit-in until our conditions are met.

Heroic student activists are paying a price for their support of University workers, though.

Urgent Support Needed for Arrested UVA Students!

At around 7PM today, all 17 of the students who have been participating in the sit-in for living wages at UVA were dragged by police officers from Madison Hall and arrested. This was the end of the fourth day of the sit-in. Students had been denied food during the sit-in, and after a grueling evening of negotiation with President Casteen that lasted until almost 4am, all their demands were denied during the day. They were informed that Casteen would be gone until Tuesday, and the arrests began after he left.

To make matters worse, the food that was provided by students and faculty, that had finally been allowed inside Madison Hall late last night was with withheld from the students and thrown out after their arrest, much of it untouched or unopened. The Living Wage Team recovered this food and will take it to a local food pantry.

President Casteen would rather put the physical and academic well-being of his students in jeopardy than consider paying decent wages to UVA workers. This is an outrage! Demand that President Casteen support living wages NOW.

That page ends with a borderline reformist appeal, urging readers to use the form provided to protest the arrest of the students and ask the university to meet the demands of the living wage campaign. It occurred to me that since agorists would not lobby the state — as we want it to do nothing but die (in its incarnation as an institution of coercion and oppression, anyway) — that perhaps one could split the difference and just edit the form to protest the arrest. While that remains an option for some, there is a more genuinely revolutionary approach available — the counter-economic approach.

I call upon UVA students on the ground to form a Movement of the Libertarian Left (MLL) cell to carry on the propaganda struggle locally at the UVA campus.

I urge them to educate themselves on matters of revolutionary doctrine, as outlined in New Libertarian Manifesto and Agorist Class Theory.

I urge them to educate their peers on the subtleties and complexities of the agorist defense of property rights as they arise in a Radical Lockean context, application of the homestead principle to unowned property. State assignations of property title are fraudulent when they contravene that principle and both State property and property of State allies are morally forfeit, as the State is merely a bandit gang. All state assets are in actuality unowned property, as is that of close state allies that are obviously members of the political class, as explained in Agorist Class Theory.

In short, President Casteen may or may not be more likely to negotiate if, suddenly, everything on campus that isn’t nailed down starts disappearing. That is irrelevant to the matter of whether or not “five-fingered homesteading” is ethically justified when we’re talking about state property. It is.

Buchanan on the Generals’ Revolt

The Generals’ Revolt - by Pat Buchanan

In just two weeks, six retired U.S. Marine and Army generals have denounced the Pentagon planning for the war in Iraq and called for the resignation or firing of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius, who travels often to Iraq and supports the war, says that the generals mirror the views of 75 percent of the officers in the field, and probably more. [emphasis added]

This is not a Cindy Sheehan moment.

Meanwhile, the Pentagon is attempting to “enlist” other retired officers into an unofficial corps of Bushie PR flack irregulars — right down to trying to put talking points in their mouths for them. Discussion at DailyKos.

RELEASED: Second Edition of Agorist Class Theory by Wally Conger

I wanted to let Wally post about this first, but I didn’t get agorism.info updated until late last night. Since I’ve been busy answering some blog comments anyway, I might as well take the time to let readers know that the new and improved second edition of Wally Conger’s Agorist Class Theory has been released!

Overall, it’s much more slickly put together, with several corrected typos, better layout and a colorful cover page. The real “meat” of the update from first to second edition, though, is the new appendix at the end which is a republication of Konkin’s 1973 article on Libertarian Class Theory, “Cui Bono? Introduction to Libertarian Class Theory“. This was several years before he would write the material for his unfinished Agorism Contra Marxism that Wally has only lately edited and summarized as Agorist Class Theory. As such, it serves as an interesting historical window on how Konkin’s views evolved.

Do democratic business models yield superior profits?

Do democratic business models yield superior profits? That would seem to be the suggestion implicit in Fortune senior editor David Kirkpatrick’s lastest Fast Forward column: The world’s most modern management is in India

NEW YORK (FORTUNE) - I have seen the future of management, and it is Indian. Vineet Nayar, president of India’s 30,000-employee HCL Technologies (Research), is creating an IT outsourcing firm where, he says, employees come first and customers second.

“Everybody was aghast the first time I said that,” admits Nayar.

Early signs suggest his bold strategy is working. Nayar has only been president for a year, a tumultuous one in which most of these innovations have been implemented. But in that time the attrition rate has dropped in half, he says; the stock more than doubled - HCL Technologies’ market cap is $4.2 billion. (The company is mostly owned by a holding company which also owns HCL Infosystems, India’s largest PC-maker.) Revenues last year grew 34 percent to $764 million.

As praxeology and common sense constantly remind us, you have to supply what the customer wants in order for a voluntary transaction to occur. Kirkpatrick is, however, echoing a long train of suggestions that an authoritarian business cultue frustrates that drive for customer satisfaction even if it overtly claims to obsess on it.

Given widespread sentiments of frustration with corporate customer service generally, and looking at widespread corporate dependence on statist subsidy for revenue — the typical business culture looks less like hard nosed and practical stewardship of resources and more like a gigantic exercise in psychological power games, at the expense of actual production and commerce.

Boycott and work stoppage on May 1st for immigrants rights

Via Yahoo News: Immigrant advocates convene May 1 work stoppage

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. immigrant rights advocates on Thursday called for a nationwide boycott of work, school and commerce on May 1, seeking to capitalize on the momentum of recent mass demonstrations across the country.

I support the action. Let me also take the opportunity to praise how remarkably non-violent the recent mass protests have been overall — particularly when one considers that those protests are in opposition to plans for massive state violence against immigrants (to include kidnapping under the euphemistic label of “deportation”) .

A childhood friend and I are on opposite sides of the issue, and it’s got me in a sort of philosophical mood about the nature of this journey called life that we all go through. On a personal level, he seems just as much of a basically good guy as he’s always been, even though I think a lot of his politics are ugly. He’s a self-described “right authoritarian” and has enthusiastically embraced the label “reactionary” in the past. On the strength of his stands on economic issues, though, he’s been classified as “left authoritarian” by some silly quiz or another. While generally socially conservative, he also has a distaste for the Religious Right which, along with a few other things, makes him difficult to stereotype or pigeonhole beyond the broad label of “authoritarian”. He wants Bush impeached, largely (but not solely) for incompetently failing to wage an adequately bloodthirsty war in Iraq.

Needless to say, we’ve been corresponding via email for years — each with a sort of morbid fascination about the others ideological standpoints that might be compared to staring at a trainwreck. I have no doubt that he thinks I’m insane.

Now, this friend — I’ll call him “Reactionary Bob” — is ardently opposed to illegal immigration. With the onset of the recent mass pro-immigration protests against H.R. 4437 and its provision to treat all illegal immigrants as felons, he predicted massive violence — a prediction that has thankfully proven, so far, inaccurate. News of the planned boycott and work stoppage May 1st has him very upset.

I asked him:

Now, I can understand being opposed to immigration even though I don’t share the view.

But, what’s the big deal about an itty bitty work stoppage? I mean, you want them gone *anyway* — right?

So relax. Just think of it as a free sample of how great things are going to be when they’re all gone.

Well, that didn’t go over so well. According to Reactionary Bob, the immigrants he wants kidnapped and/or unjustly imprisoned, and presumably killed if they attempt to defend themselves against such violent state aggression (as would be their natural right), are being “unpatriotic”. This prompted me to seek clarification:

Let me get this straight…

If the immigrants stay home from work for one day of their own free will, they’re being unpatriotic.

If, however, a political leader advocates forcibly removing them from residency (and therefore, employment) here permanently, that is patriotic?

I’m honestly not trying to be a dick, but I’ve got to tell you that it’s kind of scary that you don’t see any contradiction there.

His response could be summarized as being that immigration is very bad and that the May 1st effort somehow proves that because he’s caught the immigrants red-handed trying to “hurt America”. Additionally, there is no contradiction (although it’s not clear yet on what basis he says that).

What do you think? Post your comments and trackbacks. Sound off, you freaks.

UPDATE: Reactionary Bob says I mischaracterized his position when I said:

His response could be summarized as being that immigration is very bad and that the May 1st effort somehow proves that because he’s caught the immigrants red-handed trying to “hurt America”. Additionally, there is no contradiction (although it’s not clear yet on what basis he says that).

I told him it wasn’t intentional (if I did) and that the above was my honest perception of what he had said in email up until that point early yesterday morning when I wrote it (we had a more extensive exchange last night). I’ve invited him to post comments here. Here’s his original post, and here’s his latest on the immigration topic, in which he concludes:

“Get over it and let’s move on.”

Okay.

More on Anarchism and Democracy

MDM over at Upaya has some more great commentary on the theme of Anarchism and Democracy that I posted on here (mainly quoting Kevin Carson).

Sign of the times?

The MySpace user “V for Vendetta” is approaching 13,000 friends.

Close
E-mail It
Socialized through Gregarious 42